Connectivity for Mining and Energy Sites in Brazil

What these sites are actually carrying

The bandwidth figure is rarely the interesting part. What sets the requirement is the mix, and most of it is upload:

• Process control and telemetry, continuous and unforgiving of jitter. This is the traffic that decides whether the design works.
• Safety and access systems, which cannot be the thing that degrades when someone else saturates the link.
• Cameras. Upload-heavy, permanently on, and reliably the traffic nobody sized for.
• The camp. Crew connectivity is not a perk on a remote site — it is retention — but it must not compete with the plant for the same capacity.

The design that holds at a remote site

• Mixed by necessity, not by preference. Fibre to the nearest served point, licensed radio for the last stretch, satellite where the radio path does not close.
• A second path that fails for a different reason. At these sites the single terrestrial route is the whole risk, and satellite is one of the few options that is genuinely uncorrelated with it.
• Traffic separation with teeth. Process control, safety, cameras and camp on separate classes, so the busiest hour of the camp is not an operations event.
• A repair commitment that names who travels. On a site four hours from the nearest city, the number that matters is not availability — it is who gets in the vehicle, and when.

Why the contracting side is harder here

Mining and energy projects in Brazil are frequently run by foreign operators, and connectivity is needed during the phase when the local entity is still being set up. That is exactly when no Brazilian carrier will open a commercial relationship, because there is no CNPJ to contract with. The result is a site that is physically ready and commercially blocked.

We contract on your behalf so ordering and delivery can start before the entity exists, and we stay as the single counterpart in Brazil afterwards — one contract across every site, whether the route is fibre, licensed radio or satellite.

Questions we get asked

How do you connect a mining site in Brazil with no carrier presence?

By assembling the route rather than ordering it: fibre to the nearest served point, licensed fixed wireless for the stretch beyond it, and satellite where the radio path does not close or where a second, uncorrelated path is required. The design follows what exists at the coordinate.

Can a foreign mining or energy operator contract connectivity before opening a CNPJ?

Yes. This is the normal case in project phase. We contract on your behalf so ordering and delivery start before the Brazilian entity exists, and we remain the local counterpart for support and escalation afterwards.

Is satellite good enough for process control and telemetry?

For telemetry, monitoring, voice and video it is normally adequate at a remote site. Latency-critical closed-loop control is a different conversation and is usually kept local by design. The honest answer depends on the specific system, which is why we ask what runs at the site before proposing.

What SLA is realistic on a remote site in Brazil?

Availability figures are the easy part. What actually determines the outcome is the repair commitment: who travels to the site, from where, and within what time. On a site hours from the nearest city that clause matters more than the availability percentage above it.

Can crew and operations share the same link?

They can share the circuit but they must not share the same class of service. Camp traffic is heavy and bursty, and if it competes with process control, safety systems and cameras for the same capacity, the busiest hour of the camp becomes an operations problem.

Related: remote sites beyond the fibre map · satellite connectivity in Brazil · network redundancy · multi-site connectivity